Add initial version for conclusion preamble

chapters/6_conclusions.tex

@@ -2,11 +2,36 @@
 \chapter{Conclusions}\label{ch:conclusions}
 %************************************************
 
+\noindent{}High-level \cmls{} make it easy to express decision problems.
+They allow the modeller to reason at the level close to the problem, while the tooling of the language is able to create specifications for a range of potential \solvers{}.
+Although the importance of creating specifications that can be solved efficiently is well-known, changes in the usage of these languages are raising questions about the time required to perform this transformation.
+First, \constraint{} models are solved using low-level \solvers{}, such as \gls{mip} and \gls{sat}.
+Because of the level at which these technologies reason, specifications are more sizable and the process to reach them is more complex.
+Second, we have seen a development of the use of meta-search heuristics.
+These heuristics incrementally adjust the \constraint{} model, after which it has to be rewritten to be solved.
+Both these methods put additional pressure on the rewriting process, which can often be a bottle-neck in the overall process.
+
+In the previous chapters of this thesis, we have explored in detail and presented improvements to the process of rewriting high-level \constraint{} models into \solver{} specifications.
+These improvements focus both on the performance of the rewriting process in general, and for incremental adjustments of \constraint{} models in particular.
+Crucially, the proposed improvements in the performance of the rewriting process themselves do not impact the quality of the \solver{} specification constructed.
+This chapter presents the conclusions of this thesis.
+We present a summary of the research and its contributions and discuss the future work arising from them.
+
+\paragraph{Architecture}
+
+\paragraph{Half Reification}
+
+\paragraph{Incremental} 
+
+\paragraph{Summary}
+
+\par\noindent\rule{\textwidth}{0.4pt}
+
 This section should probably have the following components:
 
 \begin{itemize}
 	\item Quick restatement of problem/importance/motivation
-	\item Contributions, preferrably discussed per section. Relate them back to the research objectives.
+	\item Contributions, preferably discussed per section. Relate them back to the research objectives.
 	\item Limitation and Future work. This can also focus on what my work makes possible, not just what to explore next.
 	\item Concluding remarks. Maybe a summary of the findings.
 \end{itemize}